RR.1

Stiftung Warentest
April 2009 edition | Highest rating: GOOD | In the test: 26 condoms
August 2004 edition | Highest rating: GOOD | In the test: 26 condoms
June 1999 edition | Highest rating: GOOD | In the test: 29 condoms
June 1994 edition | Highest rating: GOOD | In the test: 31 condoms
June 1991 edition | Rating: VERY GOOD | In the test: 9 condoms
April 1987 edition | Rating: VERY GOOD | In the test: 21 condoms

Ideal

Stiftung Warentest
April 2009 edition | Highest rating: GOOD | In the test: 26 condoms
August 2004 edition | Highest rating: GOOD | In the test: 26 condoms
June 1999 edition | Highest rating: GOOD | In the test: 29 condoms
June 1994 edition | Highest rating: GOOD | In the test: 31 condoms
June 1991 edition | Rating: VERY GOOD | In the test: 9 condoms
October 1988 edition | Rating: VERY GOOD | In the test: 21 condoms


XXL

Stiftung Warentest
August 2004 edition | Rating: GOOD | In the test: 26 condoms

GEL+

Stiftung Warentest
December 2007 edition | Mucosa compatibility: very good (A+), microbiological quality: very good (A+), packaging: good (A-), declaration: good (A-) | In the test: 15 lubricant gels

ÖKO-TEST
May 2005 edition | Rating: VERY GOOD | In the test: 27 lubricant gels